Could they fool scholarly journals into publishing hoax papers masquerading as legitimate scholarship? The answer, it turns out, was yes. Seven journals accepted the fake papers, which were written by James Lindsay, a mathematician; Helen Pluckrose, editor of Areo; and Peter Boghossian, an assistant professor of philosophy at Portland State University. Four of the papers have been published, according to The Wall Street Journal:
October 3, at 4: The former is refined, and is aimed at perfection, accepting flaws whenever red flags are raised. The latter is raw and tasteless, but is surprisingly yet still appreciate by many, even if eaten raw.
The result of this: This is a serious problem because as scientists we look towards the literature as a beacon of reference, and we often use results and conclusions of other studies upon which to build our own new experiments.
If a certain percentage of what we use as references is bogus, then that also makes some of what we research and publish bogus. Bogus today will be fold bogus in 3 years from now.
Bohannon should also suffer consequences for his actions because he has, in effect, potentially further corrupted the literature. Of the bogus papers that were accepted, how many will eventually make it into the literature maybe we will only understand the outcome in Even one finally published paper would make his experiment dangerous.
This is a key question moving forward. That makes the Bohannon paper fundamentally flawed. There is an appeals page http: In the email, please state the reasons why you believe your publisher or journal should not be included.
The email will be forwarded to a four-member advisory board. Appeals are limited to one every 60 days. How much justice can be achieved with one appeal every 60 days?
Basically only 6 appeals a year. This clearly makes the Beall blog unscholarly. Incidentally, Science has a Impact Factor of Bohannon benefitted, financially, or in any other way, based on a paper that was based essentially on fraudulent submissions and also on a flawed assumption i.
Imagine each and every one of us had to submit fake papers to what we perceived to be predatory publishers? Then, we would, after wasting their valuable time and resources, send them a letter asking the paper to be retracted because we used a fake name and a false data set, simply because we wanted to conduct an experiment to test the system.
This whole experiment, the more I think about it, by Dr. Bohannon is so fundamentally wrong, at least from an ethical standpoint. If I were a publisher who had been scammed by Dr.
Bohannon, I would certainly be, at minimum, irritated with his show.The Sokal affair, also called the Sokal hoax, was a scholarly publishing sting perpetrated by Alan Sokal, a physics professor at New York University and University College London.
In , Sokal submitted an article to Social Text, . Apr 16, · Spoof Papers And The Ethics of Academic Publishing. Neuroskeptic is a British neuroscientist who takes a skeptical look at his own field, and beyond.
The Ethics of Research on Leaked Data.
CRAP paper accepted by journal. turn the conventional business model of academic publishing on its head by charging publication fees to the authors of research papers, After the spoof. A spoof medical paper full of easily detectable flaws was submitted in a sting operation to open access journals and accepted by more than half of them.
The results, reported in Science1 by journalist John Bohannon, reveal “an emerging Wild West in academic publishing,” he says, with. Oct 03, · Your paper indicates that you created one “spoof paper”, but in fact you created several hundred fake papers.
2. In the actual fake paper file names and also in the e-mails folder, several numbers are missing, for example: 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, etc.
Were these other fake papers that were submitted to other journals or publishers? Research papers and publications are the stepping stones of doing research and molding it into publications.
The wonderful people and our wonderful emphatic fraternity of researchers know how crucial it is to have access to .